by George Rawlinson
CHAPTER IX—SHIPS, NAVIGATION,
AND COMMERCE
Earliest navigation by means of rafts and canoes—Model of a
very primitive boat—Phoenician vessel of the time of
Sargon—Phoenician biremes in the time of Sennacherib—
Phoenician pleasure vessels and merchant ships—Superiority
of the Phoenician war-galleys—Excellence of the
arrangements—Patæci—Early navigation cautious—Increasing
boldness—Furthest ventures—Extent of the Phoenician land
commerce—Witness of Ezekiel—Wares imported—Caravans—
Description of the land trade—Sea trade of Phoenicia—1.
With her own colonies—2. With foreigners—Mediterranean and
Black Sea trade—North Atlantic trade—Trade with the West
Coast of Africa and the Canaries—Trade in the Red Sea and
Indian Ocean.
The
first attempts of the Phoenicians to navigate the sea which washed their coast
were probably as clumsy and rude as those of other primitive nations. They are
said to have voyaged from island to island, in their original abodes within the
Persian Gulf, by means of rafts.91 When they reached the shores of the Mediterranean, it can scarcely have been long ere they
constructed boats for fishing and coasting purposes, though no doubt such boats
were of a very rude construction. Probably, like other races, they began with
canoes, roughly hewn out of the trunk of a tree. The torrents which descended
from Lebanon
would from time to time bring down the stems of fallen trees in their
flood-time; and these, floating on the Mediterranean waters, would suggest the
idea of navigation. They would, at first, be hollowed out with hatchets and
adzes, or else with fire; and, later on, the canoes thus produced would form
the models for the earliest efforts in shipbuilding. The great length, however,
would soon be found unnecessary, and the canoe would give place to the boat, in
the ordinary acceptation of the term. There are models of boats among the
Phoenician remains which have a very archaic character,92 and may give us some idea of the
vessels in which the Phoenicians of the remoter times braved the perils of the
deep. They have a keel, not ill shaped, a rounded hull, bulwarks, a beak, and a
high seat for the steersman. The oars, apparently, must have been passed
through interstices in the bulwark.
From
this rude shape the transition was not very difficult to the bark represented
in the sculptures of Sargon,93 which is probably a Phoenician one.
Here four rowers, standing to their oars, impel a vessel having for prow the
head of a horse and for stern the tail of a fish, both of them rising high
above the water. The oars are curved, like golf or hockey-sticks, and are
worked from the gunwale of the bark, though there is no indication of rowlocks.
The vessel is without a rudder; but it has a mast, supported by two ropes which
are fastened to the head and stern. The mast has neither sail nor yard attached
to it, but is crowned by what is called a "crow's nest"—a bell-shaped
receptacle, from which a slinger or archer might discharge missiles against an
enemy.94
A
vessel of considerably greater size than this, but of the same class—impelled,
that is, by one bank of oars only—is indicated by certain coins, which have
been regarded by some critics as Phoenician, by others as belonging to Cilicia.95 These have a low bow, but an elevated
stern; the prow exhibits a beak, while the stern shows signs of a steering
apparatus; the number of the oars on each side is fifteen or twenty. The Greeks
called these vessels triaconters or penteconters. They are represented without
any mast on the coins, and thus seem to have been merely row-boats of a
superior character.
About
the time of Sennacherib (B.C. 700), or a little earlier, some great advances
seem to have been made by the Phoenician shipbuilders. In the first place, they
introduced the practice of placing the rowers on two different levels, one
above the other; and thus, for a vessel of the same length, doubling the number
of the rowers. Ships of this kind, which the Greeks called "biremes,"
are represented in Sennacherib's sculptures as employed by the inhabitants of a
Phoenician city, who fly in them at the moment when their town is captured, and
so escape their enemy.96 The ships are of two kinds. Both kinds
have a double tier of rowers, and both are guided by two steering oars thrust
out from the stern; but while the one is still without mast or sail, and is
rounded off in exactly the same way both at stem and stern, the other has a
mast, placed about midship, a yard hung across it, and a sail close reefed to
the yard, while the bow is armed with a long projecting beak, like a
ploughshare, which must have been capable of doing terrible damage to a hostile
vessel. The rowers, in both classes of ships, are represented as only eight or
ten upon a side; but this may have arisen from artistic necessity, since a
greater number of figures could not have been introduced without confusion. It
is thought that in the beaked vessel we have a representation of the Phoenician
war-galley; in the vessel without a beak, one of the Phoenician transport.97
A
painting on a vase found in Cyprus
exhibits what would seem to have been a pleasure-vessel.98 It is unbeaked, and without any sign of
oars, except two paddles for steering with. About midship is a short mast,
crossed by a long spar or yard, which carries a sail, closely reefed along its
entire length. The yard and sail are managed by means of four ropes, which are,
however, somewhat conventionally depicted. Both the head and stern of the
vessel rise to a considerable height above the water, and the stern is curved,
very much as in the war-galleys. It perhaps terminated in the head of a bird.
According
to the Greek writers, Phoenician vessels were mainly of two kinds, merchant
ships and war-vessels.99 The merchant ships were of a broad,
round make, what our sailors would call "tubs," resembling probably
the Dutch fishing-boats of a century ago. They were impelled both by oars and
sails, but depended mainly on the latter. Each of them had a single mast of moderate
height, to which a single sail was attached;910 this was what in modern times is
called a "square sail," a form which is only well suited for sailing
with when the wind is directly astern. It was apparently attached to the yard,
and had to be hoisted together with the yard, along which it could be closely
reefed, or from which it could be loosely shaken out. It was managed, no doubt,
by ropes attached to the two lower corners, which must have been held in the
hands of sailors, as it would have been most dangerous to belay them. As long
as the wind served, the merchant captain used his sail; when it died away, or
became adverse, he dropped yard and sail on to his deck, and made use of his
oars.
Merchant
ships had, commonly, small boats attached to them, which afforded a chance of
safety if the ship foundered, and were useful when cargoes had to be landed on
a shelving shore.911 We have no means of knowing whether
these boats were hoisted up on deck until they were wanted, or attached to the
ships by ropes and towed after them; but the latter arrangement is the more
probable.
The
war-galleys of the Phoenicians in the early times were probably of the class
which the Greeks called triaconters or penteconters, and which are represented
upon the coins. They were long open rowboats, in which the rowers sat, all of
them, upon a level, the number of rowers on either side being generally either
fifteen or twenty-five. Each galley was armed at its head with a sharp metal
spike, or beak, which was its chief weapon of offence, vessels of this class
seeking commonly to run down their enemy. After a time these vessels were
superseded by biremes, which were decked, had masts and sails, and were
impelled by rowers sitting at two different elevations, as already explained.
Biremes were ere long superseded by triremes, or vessels with three banks of
oars, which are said to have been invented at Corinth,912 but which came into use among the
Phoenicians before the end of the sixth century B.C.913 In the third century B.C. the
Carthaginians employed in war quadriremes, and even quinqueremes; but there is
no evidence of the employment of either class of vessel by the Phoenicians of
Phoenicia Proper.
The
superiority of the Phoenician ships to others is generally allowed, and was
clearly shown when Xerxes collected his fleet of twelve hundred and seven
triremes against Greece.
The fleet included contingents from Phoenicia,
Cyprus, Egypt, Cilicia, Pamphylia,
Lycia, Caria, Ionia,
Æolis, and the Greek settlements about the Propontis.914 When it reached the Hellespont,
the great king, anxious to test the quality of his ships and sailors, made
proclamation for a grand sailing match, in which all who liked might contend.
Each contingent probably—at any rate, all that prided themselves on their
nautical skill—selected its best vessel, and entered it for the coming race;
the king himself, and his grandees and officers, and all the army, stood or sat
along the shore to see: the race took place, and was won by the Phoenicians of
Sidon.915 Having thus tested the nautical skill
of the various nations under his sway, the great king, when he ventured his
person upon the dangerous element, was careful to embark in a Sidonian galley.916
A
remarkable testimony to the excellence of the Phoenician ships with respect to
internal arrangements is borne by Xenophon, who puts the following words into
the mouth of Ischomachus, a Greek:917 "I think that the best and most
perfect arrangement of things that I ever saw was when I went to look at the
great Phoenician sailing-vessel; for I saw the largest amount of naval tackling
separately disposed in the smallest stowage possible. For a ship, as you well
know, is brought to anchor, and again got under way, by a vast number of wooden
implements and of ropes and sails the sea by means of a quantity of rigging,
and is armed with a number of contrivances against hostile vessels, and carries
about with it a large supply of weapons for the crew, and, besides, has all the
utensils that a man keeps in his dwelling-house, for each of the messes. In
addition, it is laden with a quantity of merchandise which the owner carries
with him for his own profit. Now all the things which I have mentioned lay in a
space not much bigger than a room which would conveniently hold ten beds. And I
remarked that they severally lay in a way that they did not obstruct one
another, and did not require anyone to search for them; and yet they were
neither placed at random, nor entangled one with another, so as to consume time
when they were suddenly wanted for use. Also, I found the captain's assistant,
who is called 'the look-out man,' so well acquainted with the position of all
the articles, and with the number of them, that even when at a distance he
could tell where everything lay, and how many there were of each sort, just as
anyone who has learnt to read can tell the number of letters in the name of
Socrates and the proper place for each of them. Moreover, I saw this man, in
his leisure moments, examining and testing everything that a vessel needs when
at sea; so, as I was surprised, I asked him what he was about, whereupon he
replied—'Stranger, I am looking to see, in case anything should happen, how
everything is arranged in the ship, and whether anything is wanting, or is
inconveniently situated; for when a storm arises at sea, it is not possible
either to look for what is wanting, or to put to right what is arranged
awkwardly.'"
Phoenician
ships seem to have been placed under the protection of the Cabeiri, and to have
had images of them at their stem or stern or both.918 These images were not exactly
"figure-heads," as they are sometimes called. They were small,
apparently, and inconspicuous, being little dwarf figures, regarded as amulets
that would preserve the vessel in safety. We do not see them on any
representations of Phoenician ships, and it is possible that they may have been
no larger than the bronze or glazed earthenware images of Phthah that are so
common in Egypt. The Phoenicians called them pittuchim,
"sculptures,"919 whence the Greek {pataikoi} and the
French fétiche.
The
navigation of the Phoenicians, in early times, was no doubt cautious and timid.
So far from venturing out of sight of land, they usually hugged the coast,
ready at any moment, if the sea or sky threatened, to change their course and
steer directly for the shore. On a shelving coast they were not at all afraid
to run their ships aground, since, like the Greek vessels, they could be easily
pulled up out of reach of the waves, and again pulled down and launched, when
the storm was over and the sea calm once more. At first they sailed, we may be
sure, only in the daytime, casting anchor at nightfall, or else dragging their
ships up upon the beach, and so awaiting the dawn. But after a time they grew
more bold. The sea became familiar to them, the positions of coasts and islands
relatively one to another better known, the character of the seasons, the signs
of unsettled or settled weather, the conduct to pursue in an emergency, better
apprehended. They soon began to shape the course of their vessels from headland
to headland, instead of always creeping along the shore, and it was not perhaps
very long before they would venture out of sight of land, if their knowledge of
the weather satisfied them that the wind might be trusted to continue steady,
and if they were well assured of the direction of the land that they wished to
make. They took courage, moreover, to sail in the night, no less than in the
daytime, when the weather was clear, guiding themselves by the stars, and
particularly by the Polar star,920 which they discovered to be the star
most nearly marking the true north. A passage of Strabo921 seems to show that—in the later times
at any rate—they had a method of calculating the rate of a ship's sailing,
though what the method was is wholly unknown to us. It is probable that they
early constructed charts and maps, which however they would keep secret through
jealousy of their commercial rivals.
The
Phoenicians for some centuries confined their navigation within the limits of
the Mediterranean, the Propontis, and the
Euxine, land-locked seas, which are tideless and far less rough than the open
ocean. But before the time of Solomon they had passed the Pillars of Hercules,
and affronted the dangers of the Atlantic.922 Their frail and small vessels,
scarcely bigger than modern fishing-smacks, proceeded southwards along the West
African coast, as far as the tract watered by the Gambia and Senegal, while
northwards they coasted along Spain, braved the heavy seas of the Bay of
Biscay, and passing Cape Finisterre, ventured across the mouth of the English
Channel to the Cassiterides. Similarly, from the West African shore, they
boldly steered for the Fortunate
Islands (the Canaries),
visible from certain elevated points of the coast, though at 170 miles
distance. Whether they proceeded further, in the south to the Azores, Madeira,
and the Cape de Verde Islands, in the north to the coast of Holland,
and across the German
Ocean to the Baltic, we
regard as uncertain. It is possible that from time to time some of the more
adventurous of their traders may have reached thus far; but their regular,
settled, and established navigation did not, we believe, extend beyond the
Scilly Islands and coast of Cornwall to the
north-west, and to the south-west
Cape Non and the
Canaries.
The
commerce of the Phoenicians was carried on, to a large extent, by land, though
principally by sea. It appears from the famous chapter of Ezekiel923 which describes the riches and
greatness of Tyre in the sixth century B.C.,
that almost the whole of Western Asia was
penetrated by the Phoenician caravans, and laid under contribution to increase
the wealth of the Phoenician traders.
"Thou, son of man, (we read) take up a lamentation for Tyre,
and say
unto her,
O thou that dwellest at the entry of the sea,
Which art the merchant of the peoples unto many isles,
Thus saith the Lord God, Thou, O Tyre, hast said, I am perfect in
beauty.
Thy borders are in the heart of the sea;
Thy builders have perfected thy beauty.
They have made all thy planks of fir-trees from Senir;
They have taken cedars from Lebanon to make a mast for thee
Of the oaks of Bashan have they made thine oars;
They have made thy benches of ivory,
Inlaid in box-wood, from the isles of Kittim.
Of fine linen with broidered work from Egypt was thy sail,
That it might be to thee for an ensign;
Blue and purple from the isles of Elishah was thy awning.
The inhabitants of Zidon and of Arvad were thy rowers;
Thy wise men, O Tyre, were in thee—they were thy pilots.
The ancients of Gebal, and their wise men, were thy calkers;
All the ships of the sea, with their mariners, were in thee,
That they might occupy thy merchandise.
Persia, and Lud, and Phut were in thine army, thy men of war;
They hanged the shield and helmet in thee;
They set forth thy comeliness.
The men of Arvad, with thine army, were upon thy walls round about;
And the Gammadim were in thy towers;
They hanged their shields upon thy walls round about;
They have brought to perfection thy beauty.
Tarshish was thy merchant by reason of the multitude of all
kinds of
riches;
With silver, iron, tin, and lead, they traded for thy wares.
Javan, Tubal, and Meshech, they were thy traffickers;
They traded the persons of men, and vessels of brass, for thy
merchandise.
They of the house of Togarmah traded for thy wares,
With horses, and with chargers, and with mules.
The men of Dedan were thy traffickers; many isles were the mart of
thy hands;
They brought thee in exchange horns of ivory, and ebony.
Syria was thy merchant by reason of the multitude of thy
handiworks;
They traded for thy wares with emeralds, purple, and broidered
work,
And with fine linen, and coral, and rubies.
Judah, and the land of Israel, they were thy traffickers;
They traded for thy merchandise wheat of Minnith,
And Pannag, and honey, and oil, and balm.
Damascus was thy merchant for the multitude of thy handiworks;
By reason of the multitude of all kinds of riches;
With the wine of Helbon, and white wool.
Dedan and Javan traded with yarn for thy wares;
Bright iron, and cassia, and calamus were among thy merchandise.
Dedan was thy trafficker in precious cloths for riding;
Arabia, and all the princes of Kedar, they were the merchants
of thy
hand,
In lambs, and rams, and goats, in these were they thy merchants.
The traffickers of Sheba and Raamah, they were thy traffickers;
They traded for thy wares with chief of all spices,
And with all manner of precious stones, and gold.
Haran, and Canneh, and Eden, the traffickers of Sheba,
Asshur and Chilmad, were thy traffickers:
They were thy traffickers in choice wares,
In wrappings of blue and broidered work, and in chests of rich
apparel,
Bound with cords, and made of cedar, among thy merchandise.
The ships of Tarshish were thy caravans for they merchandise;
And thou wast replenished, and made very glorious, in the heart of
the sea.
Thy rowers have brought thee into great waters;
The east wind hath broken thee in the heart of the sea.
Thy reaches, and thy wares, thy merchandise, thy mariners, and thy
pilots,
Thy calkers, and the occupiers of thy merchandise,
With all the men of war, that are in thee,
Shall fall into the heart of the seas in the day of thy ruin.
At the sound of thy pilot's cry the suburb's shall shake;
And all that handle the oar, the mariners, and all the pilots
of the
sea,
They shall come down from their ships, they shall stand upon the
land,
And shall cause their voice to be heard over thee, and shall cry
bitterly,
And shall cast up dust upon their heads, and wallow in the ashes;
And they shall make themselves bald for thee, and gird them with
sackcloth,
And they shall weep for thee in bitterness of soul with bitter
mourning.
And in their wailing they shall take up a lamentation for thee,
And lament over thee saying, Who is there like Tyre,
Like her that is brought to silence in the midst of the sea?
When thy wares went forth out of the seas, thou filledst many
peoples;
Thou didst enrich the kings of the earth with thy merchandise and
thy riches.
In the time that thou was broken by the seas in the depths of the
waters,
Thy merchandise, and all thy company, did fall in the midst of
thee,
And the inhabitants of the isles are astonished at thee,
And their kings are sore afraid, they are troubled in their
countenance,
The merchants that are among the peoples, hiss at thee;
Thou art become a terror; and thou shalt never be any more."
Translating
this glorious burst of poetry into prose, we find the following countries
mentioned as carrying on an active trade with the Phoenician
metropolis:—Northern Syria, Syria of Damascus, Judah and the land of Israel,
Egypt, Arabia, Babylonia, Assyria, Upper Mesopotamia,924 Armenia,925 Central Asia Minor, Ionia, Cyprus,
Hellas or Greece,926 and Spain.927 Northern Syria furnishes the
Phoenician merchants with butz, which is translated "fine
linen," but is perhaps rather cotton,928 the "tree-wool" of
Herodotus; it also supplies embroidery, and certain precious stones, which our
translators have considered to be coral, emeralds, and rubies. Syria of
Damascus gives the "wine of Helbon"—that exquisite liquor which was
the only sort that the Persian kings would condescend to drink929—and "white wool," the dainty
fleeces of the sheep and lambs that fed on the upland pastures of Hermon and
Antilibanus. Judah and the land of Israel supply corn of superior quality,
called "corn of Minnith"—corn, i.e. produced in the rich Ammonite
country930—together with pannag, an
unknown substance, and honey, and balm, and oil. Egypt sends fine linen, one of
her best known products931—sometimes, no doubt, plain, but often
embroidered with bright patterns, and employed as such embroidered fabrics were
also in Egypt,932 for the sails of pleasure-boats.
Arabia provides her spices, cassia, and calamus (or aromatic reed), and, beyond
all doubt, frankincense,933 and perhaps cinnamon and ladanum.934 She also supplies wool and goat's
hair, and cloths for chariots, and gold, and wrought iron, and precious stones,
and ivory, and ebony, of which the last two cannot have been productions of her
own, but must have been imported from India or Abyssinia.935 Babylonia and Assyria furnish
"wrappings of blue, embroidered work, and chests of rich apparel."936 Upper Mesopotamia partakes in this
traffic.937 Armenia gives horses and mules.
Central Asia Minor (Tubal and Meshech) supplies slaves and vessels of brass,
and the Greeks of Ionia do the like. Cyprus furnishes ivory, which she must
first have imported from abroad.938 Greece Proper sends her shell-fish, to
enable the Phoenician cities to increase their manufacture of the purple dye.939 Finally, Spain yields silver, iron,
tin, and lead—the most useful of the metals—all of which she is known to have
produced in abundance.940
With
the exception of Egypt, Ionia, Cyprus, Hellas, and Spain, the Phoenician
intercourse with these places must have been carried on wholly by land. Even
with Egypt, wherewith the communication by sea was so facile, there seems to
have been also from a very early date a land commerce. The land commerce was in
every case carried on by caravans. Western Asia has never yet been in so
peaceful and orderly condition as to dispense prudent traders from the
necessity of joining together in large bodies, well provisioned and well armed,
when they are about to move valuable goods any considerable distance. There
have always been robber-tribes in the mountain tracts, and thievish Arabs upon
the plains, ready to pounce on the insufficiently protected traveller, and to
despoil him of all his belongings. Hence the necessity of the caravan traffic.
As early as the time of Joseph—probably about B.C. 1600—we find a company
of the Midianites on their way from Gilead, with their camels bearing spicery,
and balm, and myrrh, going to carry it down to Egypt.941 Elsewhere we hear of the
"travelling companies of the Dedanim,"942 of the men of Sheba bringing their
gold and frankincense;943 of a multitude of camels coming up to
Palestine with wood from Kedar and Nebaioth.944 Heeren is entirely justified in his
conclusion that the land trade of the Phoenicians was conducted by "large
companies or caravans, since it could only have been carried on in this
way."945
The
nearest neighbours of the Phoenicians on the land side were the Jews and
Israelites, the Syrians of Damascus, and the people of Northern Syria, or the
Orontes valley and the tract east of it. From the Jews and Israelites the
Phoenicians seem to have derived at all times almost the whole of the grain
which they were forced to import for their sustenance. In the time of David and
Solomon it was chiefly for wheat and barley that they exchanged the commodities
which they exported,946 in that of Ezekiel it was primarily
for "wheat of Minnith;"947 and a similar trade is noted on the
return of the Jews from the captivity,948 and in the first century of our era.949 But besides grain they also imported
from Palestine at some periods wine, oil, honey, balm, and oak timber.950 Western Palestine was notoriously a
land not only of corn, but also of wine, of olive oil, and of honey, and could
readily impart of its superfluity to its neighbour in time of need. The oaks of
Bashan are very abundant, and seem to have been preferred by the Phoenicians to
their own oaks as the material of oars.951 Balm, or basalm, was a product of the
land of Gilead,952 and also of the lower Jordan valley,
where it was of superior quality.953
From
the Damascene Syrians we are told that Phoenicia imported "wine of
Helbon" and "white wool."954 The "wine of Helbon" is
reasonably identified with that {oinos Khalubonios} which is said to have been
the favourite beverage of the Persian kings.955 It was perhaps grown in the
neighbourhood of Aleppo.956 The "white wool" may have
been furnished by the sheep that cropped the slopes of the Antilibanus, or by
those fed on the fine grass which clothes most of the plain at its base. The
fleece of these last is, according to Heeren,957 "the finest known, being improved
by the heat of the climate, the continual exposure to the open air, and the
care commonly bestowed upon the flocks." From the Syrian wool, mixed
perhaps with some other material, seems to have been woven the fabric known,
from the city where it was commonly made,958 as "damask."
According
to the existing text of Ezekiel,959 Syria Proper "occupied in the
fairs" of Phoenicia with cotton, with embroidered robes, with purple, and
with precious stones. The valley of the Orontes is suitable for the cultivation
of cotton; and embroidered robes would naturally be produced in the seat of an
old civilisation, which Syria certainly was. Purple seems somewhat out of place
in the enumeration; but the Syrians may have gathered the murex on their
seaboard between Mt. Casius and the Gulf of Issus, and have sold what they
collected in the Phoenician market. The precious stones which Ezekiel assigns
to them are difficult of identification, but may have been furnished by Casius,
Bargylus, or Amanus. These mountains, or at any rate Casius and Amanus, are of
igneous origin, and, if carefully explored, would certainly yield gems to the
investigator. At the same time it must be acknowledged that Syria had not, in
antiquity, the name of a gem-producing country; and, so far, the reading of
"Edom" for "Aram," which is preferred by many,960 may seem to be the more probable.
The
commerce of the Phoenicians with Egypt was ancient, and very extensive.
"The wares of Egypt" are mentioned by Herodotus as a portion of the
merchandise which they brought to Greece before the time of the Trojan War.961 The Tyrians had a quarter in the city
of Memphis assigned to them,962 probably from an early date. According
to Ezekiel, the principal commodity which Egypt furnished to Phoenicia was
"fine linen"963—especially the linen sails embroidered
with gay patterns, which the Egyptian nobles affected for their pleasure-boats.
They probably also imported from Egypt natron for their glass-works, papyrus
for their documents, earthenware of various kinds for exportation, scarabs and
other seals, statuettes and figures of gods, amulets, and in the later times
sarcophagi.964 Their exports to Egypt consisted of
wine on a large scale,965 tin almost certainly, and probably
their peculiar purple fabrics, and other manufactured articles.
The
Phoenician trade with Arabia was of especial importance, since not only did the
great peninsula itself produce many of the most valuable articles of commerce,
but it was also mainly, if not solely, through Arabia that the Indian market
was thrown open to the Phoenician traders, and the precious commodities
obtained for which Hindustan has always been famous. Arabia is par
excellence the land of spices, and was the main source from which the
ancient world in general, and Phoenicia in particular, obtained frankincense,
cinnamon, cassia, myrrh, calamus or sweet-cane, and ladanum.966 It has been doubted whether these
commodities were, all of them, the actual produce of the country in ancient
times, and Herodotus has been in some degree discredited, but perhaps without
sufficient reason. He is supported to a considerable extent by Theophrastus,
the disciple of Aristotle, who says:967 "Frankincense, myrrh, and cassia
grow in the Arabian districts of Saba and Hadramaut; frankincense and myrrh on
the sides or at the foot of mountains, and in the neighbouring islands. The
trees which produce them grow sometimes wild, though occasionally they are
cultivated; and the frankincense-tree grows sometimes taller than the tree
producing the myrrh." Modern authorities declare the frankincense-tree (Boswellia
thurifera) to be still a native of Hadramaut;968 and there is no doubt that the myrrh-tree
(Balsamodendron myrrha) also grows there. If cinnamon and cassia, as the
terms are now understood, do not at present grow in Arabia, or nearer to
Phoenicia than Hindustan, it may be that they have died out in the former
country, or our modern use of the terms may differ from the ancient one. On the
other hand, it is no doubt possible that the Phoenicians imagined all the
spices which they obtained from Arabia to be the indigenous growth of the
country, when in fact some of them were importations.
Next
to her spices, Arabia was famous for the production of a superior quality of
wool. The Phoenicians imported this wool largely. The flocks of Kedar are
especially noted,969 and are said to have included both
sheep and goats.970 It was perhaps a native woollen
manufacture, in which Dedan traded with Tyre, and which Ezekiel notices as a
trade in "cloths for chariots."971 Goat's hair was largely employed in
the production of coverings for tents.972 Arabia also furnished Phoenicia with
gold, with precious stones, with ivory, ebony, and wrought iron.973 The wrought iron was probably from
Yemen, which was celebrated for its manufacture of sword blades. The gold may
have been native, for there is much reason to believe that anciently the
Arabian mountain ranges yielded gold as freely as the Ethiopian,974 with which they form one system; or it
may have been imported from Hindustan, with which Arabia had certainly, in
ancient times, constant communication. Ivory and ebony must, beyond a doubt,
have been Arabian importations. There are two countries from which they may
have been derived, India and Abyssinia. It is likely that the commercial Arabs
of the south-east coast had dealings with both.975
Of
Phoenician imports into Arabia we have no account; but we may conjecture that
they consisted principally of manufactured goods, cotton and linen fabrics,
pottery, implements and utensils in metal, beads, and other ornaments for the
person, and the like. The nomadic Arabs, leading a simple life, required but
little beyond what their own country produced; there was, however, a town
population976 in the more southern parts of the
peninsula, to which the elegancies and luxuries of life, commonly exported by
Phoenicia, would have been welcome.
The
Phoenician trade with Babylonia and Assyria was carried on probably by
caravans, which traversed the Syrian desert by way of Tadmor or Palmyra, and
struck the Euphrates about Circesium. Here the route divided, passing to
Babylon southwards along the course of the great river, and to Nineveh
eastwards by way of the Khabour and the Sinjar mountain-range. Both countries
seem to have supplied the Phoenicians with fabrics of extraordinary value, rich
in a peculiar embroidery, and deemed so precious that they were packed in chests
of cedar-wood, which the Phoenician merchants must have brought with them from
Lebanon.977 The wares furnished by Assyria were in
some cases exported to Greece,978 while no doubt in others they were
intended for home consumption. They included cylinders in rock crystal, jasper,
hematite, steatite, and other materials, which may sometimes have found
purchasers in Phoenicia Proper, but appear to have been specially affected by
the Phoenician colonists in Cyprus.979 On her part Phoenicia must have
imported into Assyria and Babylonia the tin which was a necessary element in
their bronze; and they seem also to have found a market in Assyria for their
own most valuable and artistic bronzes, the exquisite embossed pateræ which are
among the most precious of the treasures brought by Sir Austen Layard from
Nineveh.980
The
nature of the Phoenician trade with Upper Mesopotamia is unknown to us; and it
is not impossible that their merchants visited Haran,981 rather because it lay on the route
which they had to follow in order to reach Armenia than because it possessed in
itself any special attraction for them. Gall-nuts and manna are almost the only
products for which the region is celebrated; and of these Phoenicia herself
produced the one, while she probably did not need the other. But the natural
route to Armenia was by way of the Coelesyrian valley, Aleppo and Carchemish,
to Haran, and thence by Amida or Diarbekr to Van, which was the capital of
Armenia in the early times.
Armenia
supplied the Phoenicians with "horses of common and of noble breeds,"982 and also with mules.983 Strabo says that it was a country
exceedingly well adapted for the breeding of the horse,984 and even notes the two qualities of
the animal that it produced, one of which he calls "Nisæan," though
the true "Nisæan plain" was in Media. So large was the number of
colts bred each year, and so highly were they valued, that, under the Persian
monarchy the Great King exacted from the province, as a regular item of its
tribute, no fewer than twenty thousand of them annually.985 Armenian mules seem not to be
mentioned by any writer besides Ezekiel; but mules were esteemed throughout the
East in antiquity,986 and no country would have been more
likely to breed them than the mountain tract of Armenia, the Switzerland of
Western Asia, where such surefooted animals would be especially needed.
Armenia
adjoined the country of the Moschi and Tibareni—the Meshech and Tubal of the
Bible. These tribes, between the ninth and the seventh centuries B.C.,
inhabited the central regions of Asia Minor and the country known later as
Cappadocia. They traded with Tyre in the "persons of men" and in
"vessels of brass" or copper.987 Copper is found abundantly in the
mountain ranges of these parts, and Xenophon remarks on the prevalence of metal
vessels in the portion of the region which he passed through—the country of the
Carduchians.988 The traffic in slaves was one in which
the Phoenicians engaged from very early times. They were not above kidnapping
men, women, and children in one country and selling them into another;989 besides which they seem to have
frequented regularly the principal slave marts of the time. They bought such
Jews as were taken captive and sold into slavery by the neighbouring nations,990 and they looked to the Moschi and
Tibareni for a constant supply of the commodity from the Black Sea region.991 The Caucasian tribes have always been
in the habit of furnishing slave-girls to the harems of the East, and the
Thracians, who were not confined to Europe, but occupied a great part of Asia
Minor, regularly trafficked in their children.992
Such
was the extent of the Phoenician land trade, as indicated by the prophet Ezekiel,
and such were, so far as is at present known, the commodities interchanged in
the course of it. It is quite possible—nay, probable—that the trade extended
much further, and certain that it must have included many other articles of
commerce besides those which we have mentioned. The sources of our information
on the subject are so few and scanty, and the notices from which we derive our
knowledge for the most part so casual, that we may be sure what is preserved is
but a most imperfect record of what was—fragments of wreck recovered from the
sea of oblivion. It may have been a Phoenician caravan route which Herodotus
describes as traversed on one occasion by the Nasamonians,993 which began in North Africa and
terminated with the Niger and the city of Timbuctoo; and another, at which he
hints as lying between the coast of the Lotus-eaters and Fezzan.994 Phoenician traders may have
accompanied and stimulated the slave hunts of the Garamantians,995 as Arab traders do those of the
Central African nations at the present day. Again, it is quite possible that
the Phoenicians of Memphis designed and organised the caravans which,
proceeding from Egyptian Thebes, traversed Africa from east to west along the
line of the "Salt Hills," by way of Ammon, Augila, Fezzan, and the
Tuarik country to Mount Atlas.996 We can scarcely imagine the Egyptians
showing so much enterprise. But these lines of traffic can be ascribed to the
Phoenicians only by conjecture, history being silent on the subject.
The
sea trade of the Phoenicians was still more extensive than their land traffic.
It is divisible into two branches, their trade with their own colonists, and
that with the natives of the various countries to which they penetrated in
their voyages. The colonies sent out from Phoenicia were, except in the single
instance of Carthage, trading settlements, planted where some commodity or
commodities desired by the mother-country abounded, and were intended to secure
to the mother-country the monopoly of such commodity or commodities. For
instance, Cyprus was colonised for the sake of its copper mines and its timber;
Cilicia and Lycia for their timber only; Thasos for its gold mines; Salamis and
Cythera for the purple trade; Sardinia and Spain for their numerous metals;
North Africa for its fertility and for the trade with the interior. Phoenicia
expected to derive, primarily, from each colony the commodity or commodities
which had caused the selection of the site. In return she supplied the
colonists with her own manufactured articles; with fabrics in linen, wool,
cotton, and perhaps to some extent in silk; with every variety of pottery, from
dishes and jugs of the plainest and most simple kind to the most costly and
elaborate vases and amphoræ; with metal utensils and arms, with gold and silver
ornaments, with embossed shields and pateræ, with faïnce and glass, and also
with any foreign products or manufactures that they desired and that the
countries within the range of her influence could furnish. Phoenicia must have
imported into Cyprus, to suit a peculiar Cyprian taste, the Egyptian
statuettes, scarabs, and rings,997 and the Assyrian and Babylonian
cylinders, which have been found there. The tin which she brought from the
Cassiterides she distributed generally, for she did not discourage her
colonists from manufacturing for themselves to some extent. There was probably
no colony which did not make its own bronze vessels of the commoner sort and
its own coarser pottery.
In her
trade with the nations who peopled the coasts of the Mediterranean, the
Propontis, and the Black Sea, Phoenicia aimed primarily at disposing to
advantage of her own commodities, secondarily at making a profit in commodities
which she had obtained from other countries, and thirdly on obtaining
commodities which she might dispose of to advantage elsewhere. Where the
nations were uncivilised, or in a low condition of civilisation, she looked to
making a large profit by furnishing them at a cheap rate with all the simplest
conveniences of life, with their pottery, their implements and utensils, their
clothes, their arms, the ornaments of their persons and of their houses.
Underselling the native producers, she soon obtained a monopoly of this kind of
trade, drove the native products out of the market, and imposed her own
instead, much as the manufacturers of Manchester, Birmingham, and the Potteries
impose their calicoes, their cutlery, and their earthenware on the savages of
Africa and Polynesia. Where culture was more advanced, as in Greece and parts
of Italy,998 she looked to introduce, and no doubt
succeeded in introducing, the best of her own productions, fabrics of crimson,
violet, and purple, painted vases, embossed pateræ, necklaces, bracelets,
rings—"cunning work" of all manner of kinds999—mirrors, glass vessels, and
smelling-bottles. At the same time she also disposed at a profit of many of the
wares that she had imported from foreign countries, which were advanced in
certain branches of art, as Egypt, Babylonia, Assyria, possibly India. The
muslins and ivory of Hindustan, the shawls of Kashmir, the carpets of Babylon, the
spices of Araby the Blest, the pearls of the Persian Gulf, the faïence and the
papyrus of Egypt, would be readily taken by the more civilised of the Western
nations, who would be prepared to pay a high price for them. They would pay for
them partly, no doubt, in silver and gold, but to some extent also in their own
manufactured commodities, Attica in her ceramic products, Corinth in her
"brass," Etruria in her candelabra and engraved mirrors,9100 Argos in her highly elaborated
ornaments.9101 Or, in some cases, they might make
return out of the store wherewith nature had provided them, Euboea rendering
her copper, the Peloponnese her "purple," Crete her timber, the
Cyrenaica its silphium.
Outside
the Pillars of Hercules the Phoenicians had only savage nations to deal with,
and with these they seem to have traded mainly for the purpose of obtaining
certain natural products, either peculiarly valuable or scarcely procurable
elsewhere. Their trade with the Scilly Islands and the coast of Cornwall was
especially for the procuring of tin. Of all the metals, tin is found in the
fewest places, and though Spain seems to have yielded some anciently,9102 yet it can only have been in small
quantities, while there was an enormous demand for tin in all parts of the old
world, since bronze was the material almost universally employed for arms,
tools, implements, and utensils of all kinds, while tin is the most important,
though not the largest, element in bronze. From the time that the Phoenicians
discovered the Scilly Islands—the "Tin Islands" (Cassiterides), as
they called them—it is probable that the tin of the civilised world was almost
wholly derived from this quarter. Eastern Asia, no doubt, had always its own
mines, and may have exported tin to some extent, in the remoter times,
supplying perhaps the needs of Egypt, Assyria, and Babylon. But, after the rich
stores of the metal which our own islands possess were laid open, and the
Phoenicians with their extensive commercial dealings, both in the West and in
the East, became interested in diffusing it, British tin probably drove all
other out of use, and obtained the monopoly of the markets wherever Phoenician
influence prevailed. Hence the trade with the Cassiterides was constant, and so
highly prized that a Phoenician captain, finding his ship followed by a Roman
vessel, preferred running it upon the rocks to letting a rival nation learn the
secret of how the tin-producing coast might be approached in safety.9103 With the tin it was usual for the
merchants to combine a certain amount of lead and a certain quantity of skins
or hides; while they gave in exchange pottery, salt, and articles in bronze,
such as arms, implements, and utensils for cooking and for the table.9104
If the
Phoenicians visited, as some maintain that they did,9105 the coasts of the Baltic, it must
have been for the purpose of obtaining amber. Amber is thrown up largely by the
waters of that land-locked sea, and at present especially abounds on the shore
in the vicinity of Dantzic. It is very scarce elsewhere. The Phoenicians seem
to have made use of amber in their necklaces from a very early date;9106 and, though they might no doubt have
obtained it by land-carriage across Europe to the head of the Adriatic, yet
their enterprise and their commercial spirit were such as would not improbably
have led them to seek to open a direct communication with the amber-producing
region, so soon as they knew where it was situated. The dangers of the German
Ocean are certainly not greater than those of the Atlantic; and if the
Phoenicians had sufficient skill in navigation to reach Britain and the
Fortunate Islands, they could have found no very serious difficulty in
penetrating to the Baltic. On the other hand, there is no direct evidence of
their having penetrated so far, and perhaps the Adriatic trade may have
supplied them with as much amber as they needed.
The
trade of the Phoenicians with the west coast of Africa had for its principal
objects the procuring of ivory, of elephant, lion, leopard, and deer-skins, and
probably of gold. Scylax relates that there was an established trade in his day
(about B.C. 350) between Phoenicia and an island which he calls Cerne, probably
Arguin, off the West African coast. "The merchants," he says,9107 "who are Phoenicians, when they
have arrived at Cerne, anchor their vessels there, and after having pitched
their tents upon the shore, proceed to unload their cargo, and to convey it in
smaller boats to the mainland. The dealers with whom they trade are Ethiopians;
and these dealers sell to the Phoenicians skins of deer, lions, panthers, and
domestic animals—elephants' skins also, and their teeth. The Ethiopians wear
embroidered garments, and use ivory cups as drinking vessels; their women adorn
themselves with ivory bracelets; and their horses also are adorned with ivory.
The Phoenicians convey to them ointment, elaborate vessels from Egypt,
castrated swine(?), and Attic pottery and cups. These last they commonly
purchase [in Athens] at the Feast of Cups. These Ethiopians are eaters of flesh
and drinkers of milk; they make also much wine from the vine; and the
Phoenicians, too, supply some wine to them. They have a considerable city, to
which the Phoenicians sail up." The river on which the city stood was
probably the Senegal.
It
will be observed that Scylax says nothing in this passage of any traffic for
gold. We can scarcely suppose, however, that the Phoenicians, if they
penetrated so far south as this, could remain ignorant of the fact that West
Africa was a gold-producing country, much less that, being aware of the fact,
they would fail to utilise it. Probably they were the first to establish that
"dumb commerce" which was afterwards carried on with so much
advantage to themselves by the Carthaginians, and whereof Herodotus gives so
graphic an account. "There is a country," he says,9108 "in Libya, and a nation, beyond
the Pillars of Hercules, which the Carthaginians are wont to visit, where they
no sooner arrive than forthwith they unlade their wares, and having disposed
them after an orderly fashion along the beach, there leave them, and returning
aboard their ships, raise a great smoke. The natives, when they see the sample,
come down to the shore, and laying out to view so much gold as they think the
wares are worth, withdraw to a distance. The Carthaginians upon this come
ashore again and look. If they think the gold to be enough, they take it and go
their way; but if it does not seem to them sufficient, they go aboard ship once
more, and wait patiently. Then the others approach and add to their gold, till
the Carthaginians are satisfied. Neither party deals unfairly by the other: for
they themselves never touch the gold till it comes up to the worth of their
goods, nor do the natives ever carry off the goods until the gold has been
taken away."
The
nature of the Phoenician trade with the Canaries, or Fortunate Islands, is not
stated by any ancient author, and can only be conjectured. It would scarcely
have been worth the Phoenicians' while to convey timber to Syria from such a
distance, or we might imagine the virgin forests of the islands attracting
them.9109 The large breed of dogs from which
the Canaries derived their later name9110 may perhaps have constituted an article
of export even in Phoenician times, as we know they did later, when we hear of
their being conveyed to King Juba;9111 but there is an entire lack of evidence
on the subject. Perhaps the Phoenicians frequented the islands less for the
sake of commerce than for that of watering and refitting the ships engaged in
the African trade, since the natives were less formidable than those who
inhabited the mainland.9112
There
was one further direction in which the Phoenicians pushed their maritime trade,
not perhaps continuously, but at intervals, when their political relations were
such as to give them access to the sea which washed Asia on the south and on
the southeast. The nearest points at which they could embark for the purpose of
exploring or utilising the great tract of ocean in this quarter were the inner recesses
of the two deep gulfs known as the Persian and the Arabian. It has been thought
by some9113 that there were times in their
history when the Phoenicians had the free use of both these gulfs, and could
make the starting-point of their eastern explorations and trading voyages
either a port on one of the two arms into which the Red Sea divides towards the
north, or a harbour on the Persian Gulf near its north-western extremity. But
the latter supposition rests upon grounds which are exceedingly unsafe and
uncertain. That the Phoenicians migrated at some remote period from the shores
of the Persian Gulf to the Mediterranean may be allowed to be highly probable;
but that, after quitting their primitive abodes and moving off nearly a
thousand miles to the westward, they still maintained a connection with their
early settlements and made them centres for a trade with the Far East, is as
improbable a hypothesis as any that has ever received the sanction of men of
learning and repute. The Babylonians, through whose country the connection must
have been kept up, were themselves traders, and would naturally keep the
Arabian and Indian traffic in their own hands; nor can we imagine them as
brooking the establishment of a rival upon their shores. The Arabians were more
friendly; but they, too, would have disliked to share their carrying trade with
a foreign nation. And the evidence entirely fails to show that the Phoenicians,
from the time of their removal to the Mediterranean, ever launched a vessel in
the Persian Gulf, or had any connection with the nations inhabiting its shores,
beyond that maintained by the caravans which trafficked by land between the
Phoenician cities and the men of Dedan and Babylon.9114
It was
otherwise with the more western gulf. There, certainly, from time to time, the
Phoenicians launched their fleets, and carried on a commerce which was scarcely
less lucrative because they had to allow the nations whose ports they used a
participation in its profits. It is not impossible that, occasionally, the
Egyptians allowed them to build ships in some one or more of their Red Sea
ports, and to make such port or ports the head-quarters of a trade which may
have proceeded beyond the Straits of Babelmandeb and possibly have reached
Zanzibar and Ceylon. At any rate, we know that, in the time of Solomon, two
harbours upon the Red Sea were open to them—viz. Eloth and Ezion-Geber—both
places situated in the inner recess of the Elanitic Gulf, or Gulf of Akaba, the
more eastern of the two arms into which the Red Sea divides. David's conquest
of Edom had put these ports into the possession of the Israelites, and the
friendship between Hiram and Solomon had given the Phoenicians free access to
them. It was the ambition of Solomon to make the Israelites a nautical people,
and to participate in the advantages which he perceived to have accrued to
Phoenicia from her commercial enterprise. Besides sharing with the Phoenicians
in the trade of the Mediterranean,9115 he constructed with their help a
fleet at Ezion-Geber upon the Red Sea,9116 and the two allies conjointly made
voyages to the region, or country, called Ophir, for the purpose of procuring
precious stones, gold, and almug-wood.9117 Ophir is, properly speaking, a
portion of Arabia,9118 and Arabia was famous for its
production of gold,9119 and also for its precious stones.9120 Whether it likewise produced
almug-trees is doubtful;9121 and it is quite possible that the
joint fleet went further than Ophir proper, and obtained the
"almug-wood" from the east coast of Africa, or from India. The
Somauli country might have been as easily reached as South-eastern Arabia, and
if India is considerably more remote, yet there was nothing to prevent the
Phoenicians from finding their way to it.9122 We have, however, no direct evidence
that their commerce in the Indian Ocean ever took them further than the Arabian
coast, about E. Long. 55º.